↓ Skip to main content

A novel survival multifactor dimensionality reduction method for detecting gene–gene interactions with application to bladder cancer prognosis

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A novel survival multifactor dimensionality reduction method for detecting gene–gene interactions with application to bladder cancer prognosis
Published in
Human Genetics, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00439-010-0905-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiang Gui, Jason H. Moore, Karl T. Kelsey, Carmen J. Marsit, Margaret R. Karagas, Angeline S. Andrew

Abstract

The widespread use of high-throughput methods of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping has created a number of computational and statistical challenges. The problem of identifying SNP-SNP interactions in case-control studies has been studied extensively, and a number of new techniques have been developed. Little progress has been made, however, in the analysis of SNP-SNP interactions in relation to time-to-event data, such as patient survival time or time to cancer relapse. We present an extension of the two class multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) algorithm that enables detection and characterization of epistatic SNP-SNP interactions in the context of survival analysis. The proposed Survival MDR (Surv-MDR) method handles survival data by modifying MDR's constructive induction algorithm to use the log-rank test. Surv-MDR replaces balanced accuracy with log-rank test statistics as the score to determine the best models. We simulated datasets with a survival outcome related to two loci in the absence of any marginal effects. We compared Surv-MDR with Cox-regression for their ability to identify the true predictive loci in these simulated data. We also used this simulation to construct the empirical distribution of Surv-MDR's testing score. We then applied Surv-MDR to genetic data from a population-based epidemiologic study to find prognostic markers of survival time following a bladder cancer diagnosis. We identified several two-loci SNP combinations that have strong associations with patients' survival outcome. Surv-MDR is capable of detecting interaction models with weak main effects. These epistatic models tend to be dropped by traditional Cox regression approaches to evaluating interactions. With improved efficiency to handle genome wide datasets, Surv-MDR will play an important role in a research strategy that embraces the complexity of the genotype-phenotype mapping relationship since epistatic interactions are an important component of the genetic basis of disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 5%
United States 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 39 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 30%
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Master 6 14%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Computer Science 5 12%
Mathematics 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,475,259
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#935
of 2,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,595
of 99,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.