You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mutant IDH1-specific immunohistochemistry distinguishes diffuse astrocytoma from astrocytosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00401-009-0632-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandra Camelo-Piragua, Michael Jansen, Aniruddha Ganguly, J. ChulMin Kim, David N. Louis, Catherine L. Nutt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 43 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
Other | 12 | 27% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 51% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,711,393
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,048
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,151
of 164,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.