↓ Skip to main content

Conceptual heterogeneity and the legacy of organicism: thoughts on the life organic

Overview of attention for article published in History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Conceptual heterogeneity and the legacy of organicism: thoughts on the life organic
Published in
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40656-019-0263-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel S. Brooks

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,204,587
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
#168
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,311
of 354,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.