↓ Skip to main content

Functional genomics, proteomics, and regulatory DNA analysis in isogenic settings using zinc finger nuclease-driven transgenesis into a safe harbor locus in the human genome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
55 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
278 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional genomics, proteomics, and regulatory DNA analysis in isogenic settings using zinc finger nuclease-driven transgenesis into a safe harbor locus in the human genome
Published in
Genome Research, May 2010
DOI 10.1101/gr.106773.110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Russell C. DeKelver, Vivian M. Choi, Erica A. Moehle, David E. Paschon, Dirk Hockemeyer, Sebastiaan H. Meijsing, Yasemin Sancak, Xiaoxia Cui, Eveline J. Steine, Jeffrey C. Miller, Phillip Tam, Victor V. Bartsevich, Xiangdong Meng, Igor Rupniewski, Sunita M. Gopalan, Helena C. Sun, Kathleen J. Pitz, Jeremy M. Rock, Lei Zhang, Gregory D. Davis, Edward J. Rebar, Iain M. Cheeseman, Keith R. Yamamoto, David M. Sabatini, Rudolf Jaenisch, Philip D. Gregory, Fyodor D. Urnov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 406 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 113 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 24%
Student > Master 47 11%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Professor 23 5%
Other 59 14%
Unknown 55 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 194 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 100 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 6%
Neuroscience 8 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 68 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,863,383
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#1,409
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,639
of 105,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.