↓ Skip to main content

Mendelian randomization studies on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: evidence and limitations

Overview of attention for article published in Science China Life Sciences, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Mendelian randomization studies on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: evidence and limitations
Published in
Science China Life Sciences, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11427-019-9537-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qin Hu, Panpan Hao, Qiji Liu, Mei Dong, Yaoqin Gong, Cheng Zhang, Yun Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 9 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Computer Science 2 11%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,682,602
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Science China Life Sciences
#631
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,177
of 351,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Life Sciences
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.