| Title |
Carbon cycle amplification: how optimistic assumptions cause persistent underestimates of potential climate damages and mitigation needs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-009-9607-1 |
| Authors |
Paul A. T. Higgins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Czechia | 1 | 8% |
| Réunion | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 50% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 42% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 25% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,759,562
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,602
of 5,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,583
of 111,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.