| Title |
Anterior Leaflet Laceration to Prevent Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction During Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaffar M. Khan, Vasilis C. Babaliaros, Adam B. Greenbaum, Jason R. Foerst, Shahram Yazdani, James M. McCabe, Gaetano Paone, Marvin H. Eng, Bradley G. Leshnower, Patrick T. Gleason, Marcus Y. Chen, Dee Dee Wang, Xin Tian, Annette M. Stine, Toby Rogers, Robert J. Lederman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 50% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#526,276
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,323
of 16,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,527
of 364,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#52
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.