| Title |
Use of an expert panel to identify domains and indicators of delirium severity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-019-02201-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dena Schulman-Green, Eva M. Schmitt, Tamara G. Fong, Sarinnapha M. Vasunilashorn, Jacqueline Gallagher, Edward R. Marcantonio, Charles H. Brown, Diane Clark, Joseph H. Flaherty, Anne Gleason, Sharon Gordon, Ann M. Kolanowski, Karin J. Neufeld, Margaret O’Connor, Margaret A. Pisani, Thomas N. Robinson, Joe Verghese, Heidi L. Wald, Richard N. Jones, Sharon K. Inouye |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,422,139
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#156
of 3,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,188
of 358,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#7
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.