↓ Skip to main content

A simple and relatively efficient triangulation of then-cube

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A simple and relatively efficient triangulation of then-cube
Published in
Discrete & Computational Geometry, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/bf02574690
Authors

Mark Haiman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 33%
Mathematics 2 22%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2013.
All research outputs
#12,948,055
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#321
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,093
of 68,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.