↓ Skip to main content

MYD88 L265P in Waldenström macroglobulinemia, immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy, and other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders using conventional and quantitative allele-specific polymerase…

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
13 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MYD88 L265P in Waldenström macroglobulinemia, immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy, and other B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders using conventional and quantitative allele-specific polymerase chain reaction
Published in
Blood, January 2013
DOI 10.1182/blood-2012-09-454355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lian Xu, Zachary R. Hunter, Guang Yang, Yangsheng Zhou, Yang Cao, Xia Liu, Enrica Morra, Alessandra Trojani, Antonino Greco, Luca Arcaini, Marzia Varettoni, Jennifer R. Brown, Yu-Tzu Tai, Kenneth C. Anderson, Nikhil C. Munshi, Christopher J. Patterson, Robert J. Manning, Christina K. Tripsas, Neal I. Lindeman, Steven P. Treon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 13 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 41 28%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#4,889
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,411
of 307,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#51
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.