↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric clinics of North America, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,242)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
249 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
592 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published in
Pediatric clinics of North America, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.pcl.2014.09.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacy L. Cooper, Patrick A. Brown

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric oncologic diagnosis, and advances in its treatment have led to progressive improvements in survival. The 4 main components of therapy are remission induction, consolidation, maintenance, and central nervous system-directed therapy, and usually last 2 to 3 years. Treatment intensity based on risk-based stratification is the cornerstone of treatment. Patients with features of more favorable disease are spared the more toxic effects of chemotherapy, whereas more aggressive regimens are reserved for those with higher-risk disease. Prognosis of relapsed pediatric ALL depends primarily on duration of remission and site of relapse.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 592 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 586 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 102 17%
Student > Master 101 17%
Researcher 48 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 8%
Other 35 6%
Other 82 14%
Unknown 176 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 173 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 4%
Other 54 9%
Unknown 189 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#334,632
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric clinics of North America
#16
of 1,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,255
of 271,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric clinics of North America
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.