| Title |
Active rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN22714229]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-7-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rob JEM Smeets, Johan WS Vlaeyen, Alita Hidding, Arnold DM Kester, Geert JMG van der Heijden, Antonia CM van Geel, J André Knottnerus |
| Abstract |
The treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain is often based on three different models regarding the development and maintenance of pain and especially functional limitations: the deconditioning model, the cognitive behavioral model and the biopsychosocial model. There is evidence that rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain is more effective than no treatment, but information is lacking about the differential effectiveness of different kinds of rehabilitation. A direct comparison of a physical, a cognitive-behavioral treatment and a combination of both has never been carried out so far. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 311 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 20% |
| Unknown | 55 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 21% |
| Psychology | 34 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,971,559
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#565
of 4,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,314
of 170,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.