↓ Skip to main content

Disturbance of deep-sea environments induced by the M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disturbance of deep-sea environments induced by the M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/srep00270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinsuke Kawagucci, Yukari T. Yoshida, Takuroh Noguchi, Makio C. Honda, Hiroshi Uchida, Hidenori Ishibashi, Fumiko Nakagawa, Urumu Tsunogai, Kei Okamura, Yoshihiro Takaki, Takuro Nunoura, Junichi Miyazaki, Miho Hirai, Weiren Lin, Hiroshi Kitazato, Ken Takai

Abstract

The impacts of the M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake on deep-sea environment were investigated 36 and 98 days after the event. The light transmission anomaly in the deep-sea water after 36 days became atypically greater (∼35%) and more extensive (thickness ∼1500 m) near the trench axis owing to the turbulent diffusion of fresh seafloor sediment, coordinated with potential seafloor displacement. In addition to the chemical influx associated with sediment diffusion, an influx of (13)C-enriched methane from the deep sub-seafloor reservoirs was estimated. This isotopically unusual methane influx was possibly triggered by the earthquake and its aftershocks that subsequently induced changes in the sub-seafloor hydrogeologic structures. The whole prokaryotic biomass and the development of specific phylotypes in the deep-sea microbial communities could rise and fall at 36 and 98 days, respectively, after the event. We may capture the snap shots of post-earthquake disturbance in deep-sea chemistry and microbial community responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Mexico 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Environmental Science 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Chemistry 5 7%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,221,077
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#12,026
of 123,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,674
of 155,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#16
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.