↓ Skip to main content

Pursuing Soft Power through the Confucius Institute: a Large-N Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chinese Political Science, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Pursuing Soft Power through the Confucius Institute: a Large-N Analysis
Published in
Journal of Chinese Political Science, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11366-018-9571-6
Authors

Wei-hao Huang, Jun Xiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 31%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 48%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,078,362
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#74
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,314
of 335,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.