↓ Skip to main content

Adoptive transfer of HER2/neu-specific T cells expanded with alternating gamma chain cytokines mediate tumor regression when combined with the depletion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Adoptive transfer of HER2/neu-specific T cells expanded with alternating gamma chain cytokines mediate tumor regression when combined with the depletion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00262-008-0609-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna K. Morales, Maciej Kmieciak, Laura Graham, Marta Feldmesser, Harry D. Bear, Masoud H. Manjili

Abstract

Adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) using ex vivo-expanded HER-2/neu-specific T cells has shown initial promising results against disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow. However, it has failed to promote objective responses against primary tumors. We report for the first time that alternating gamma chain cytokines (IL-2, IL-7 and IL-15) ex vivo can expand the neu-specific lymphocytes that can kill breast tumors in vitro. However, the anti-tumor efficacy of these neu-specific T cells was compromised by the increased levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) during the premalignant stage in FVBN202 transgenic mouse model of breast carcinoma. Combination of AIT with the depletion of MDSC, in vivo, resulted in the regression of neu positive primary tumors. Importantly, neu-specific antibody responses were restored only when AIT was combined with the depletion of MDSC. In vitro studies determined that MDSC caused inhibition of T cell proliferation in a contact-dependent manner. Together, these results suggest that combination of AIT with depletion or inhibition of MDSC could lead to the regression of mammary tumors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,475,808
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#1,038
of 2,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,562
of 92,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.