| Title |
Protein quality evaluation of amaranth in adult humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, March 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01087917 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Bressani, E. C. M. De Martell, C. M. De Godínez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,997,485
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#126
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#979
of 20,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them