↓ Skip to main content

A Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Thyroid Disease Using Extreme Learning Machine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
A Computer Aided Diagnosis System for Thyroid Disease Using Extreme Learning Machine
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10916-012-9825-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Na Li, Ji-Hong Ouyang, Hui-Ling Chen, Da-You Liu

Abstract

In this paper, we present an effective and efficient computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system based on principle component analysis (PCA) and extreme learning machine (ELM) to assist the task of thyroid disease diagnosis. The CAD system is comprised of three stages. Focusing on dimension reduction, the first stage applies PCA to construct the most discriminative new feature set. After then, the system switches to the second stage whose target is model construction. ELM classifier is explored to train an optimal predictive model whose parameters are optimized. As we known, the number of hidden neurons has an important role in the performance of ELM, so we propose an experimental method to hunt for the optimal value. Finally, the obtained optimal ELM model proceeds to perform the thyroid disease diagnosis tasks using the most discriminative new feature set and the optimal parameters. The effectiveness of the resultant CAD system (PCA-ELM) has been rigorously estimated on a thyroid disease dataset which is taken from UCI machine learning repository. We compare it with other related methods in terms of their classification accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that PCA-ELM outperforms other ones reported so far by 10-fold cross-validation method, with the mean accuracy of 97.73% and with the maximum accuracy of 98.1%. Besides, PCA-ELM performs much faster than support vector machines (SVM) based CAD system. Consequently, the proposed method PCA-ELM can be considered as a new powerful tools for diagnosing thyroid disease with excellent performance and less time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 25 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 24%
Engineering 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Mathematics 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 29 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#657
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,028
of 249,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.