| Title |
Labelling chronic illness in primary care: a good or a bad thing?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, December 2004
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Bedson, Rob McCarney, Peter Croft |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 67 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,052,063
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,001
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,758
of 151,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.