↓ Skip to main content

Trends in Centralization of Cancer Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Trends in Centralization of Cancer Surgery
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, June 2010
DOI 10.1245/s10434-010-1159-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karyn B. Stitzenberg, Neal J. Meropol

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Ukraine 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 55%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,475,808
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,628
of 6,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,506
of 94,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.