You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anticipatory syringe drivers: a step too far
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001728 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ben Bowers, Richella Ryan, Sarah Hoare, Kristian Pollock, Stephen Barclay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 38 | 63% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 27 | 45% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#835,587
of 25,652,464 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#64
of 1,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,166
of 364,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,652,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.