↓ Skip to main content

A telemedicine network to support paediatric care in small hospitals in rural Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A telemedicine network to support paediatric care in small hospitals in rural Tanzania
Published in
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, October 2011
DOI 10.1258/jtt.2011.110312
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carsten Krüger, Mauri Niemi

Abstract

We reviewed our experience with the Tanzanian Telemedicine Network in supporting paediatric care at 40 small, rural hospitals in the country. The network began operating in 2008. Store and forward telemedicine was provided via the open source software iPath. The 33 volunteer consultants were based in several countries, although most of them had practical experience in Tanzania. During the first three years of network operation there were 533 referrals. There were 159 paediatric cases (median age five years). Three paediatric specialists provided most consultations (64%), but other specialists provided recommendations when required. The response time was usually less than two days (median 6 h; inter-quartile range 2-24 h). A precise recommendation was not always provided, but since all consultants had an intimate knowledge of the state of health services in Tanzania, their advice was usually well adapted to the local circumstances of the hospitals. Referral to a higher level of care was recommended in 26 cases (16%). A simple web-based telemedicine system combined with email alerts is feasible in remote locations in Tanzania, even where fast Internet connections are not available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Computer Science 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 5 7%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#845
of 1,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,862
of 132,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.