| Title |
Optimal threshold in CT quantification of emphysema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-012-2683-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhimin Wang, Suicheng Gu, Joseph K. Leader, Shinjini Kundu, John R. Tedrow, Frank C. Sciurba, David Gur, Jill M. Siegfried, Jiantao Pu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 47% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,475,808
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,124
of 4,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,309
of 184,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#11
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.