Title |
Variability in the Quality of Pathology Reporting of Margin Status Following Breast Cancer Surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-011-1916-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Persing, Ted A. James, John Mace, Andrew Goodwin, Berta Geller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ukraine | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 25% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2012.
All research outputs
#5,725,772
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,850
of 6,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,617
of 131,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.