| Title |
Standardization of Surgical and Pathologic Variables is Needed in Multicenter Trials of Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Results from the ACOSOG Z5031 Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-010-1282-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew H. G. Katz, Nipun B. Merchant, Steven Brower, Megan Branda, Mitchell C. Posner, L. William Traverso, Ross A. Abrams, Vincent J. Picozzi, Peter W. T. Pisters |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 30% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,112,972
of 24,341,979 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,882
of 6,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,601
of 97,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,341,979 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.