| Title |
Targeting monoamine oxidase A in advanced prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00432-010-0835-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent Flamand, Hongjuan Zhao, Donna M. Peehl |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,465,367
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#133
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,546
of 95,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.