| Title |
PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-010-1423-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Habib Zaidi, Issam El Naqa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 213 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 23% |
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 26% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 36 | 16% |
| Engineering | 33 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 33 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,968,506
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#596
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,939
of 96,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.