| Title |
An overview of positive cultures and clinical outcomes in septic patients: a sub-analysis of the Prehospital Antibiotics Against Sepsis (PHANTASi) trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2431-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rishi S. Nannan Panday, Eline M. J. Lammers, Nadia Alam, Prabath W. B. Nanayakkara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 4 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,091,771
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,910
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,367
of 364,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#67
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.