Title |
Upper reference limits of transient ischemic dilation ratio for different protocols on new-generation cadmium zinc telluride cameras: A report from REFINE SPECT registry
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12350-019-01730-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lien-Hsin Hu, Tali Sharir, Robert J H Miller, Andrew J Einstein, Mathews B Fish, Terrence D Ruddy, Sharmila Dorbala, Marcelo Di Carli, Philipp A Kaufmann, Albert J Sinusas, Edward J Miller, Timothy M Bateman, Julian Betancur, Guido Germano, Joanna X Liang, Frederic Commandeur, Peyman N Azadani, Heidi Gransar, Yuka Otaki, Balaji K Tamarappoo, Damini Dey, Daniel S Berman, Piotr J Slomka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 55% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Librarian | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,134,898
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#272
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,726
of 365,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#12
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.