↓ Skip to main content

Differential niche and Wnt requirements during acute myeloid leukemia progression

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential niche and Wnt requirements during acute myeloid leukemia progression
Published in
Blood, July 2011
DOI 10.1182/blood-2011-03-345165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven W. Lane, Yingzi J. Wang, Cristina Lo Celso, Christine Ragu, Lars Bullinger, Stephen M. Sykes, Francesca Ferraro, Sebastian Shterental, Charles P. Lin, D. Gary Gilliland, David T. Scadden, Scott A. Armstrong, David A. Williams

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 132 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Professor 8 6%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Engineering 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#14,241
of 33,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,829
of 128,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#180
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.