| Title |
Research utilization among children's mental health providers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-3-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie A Barwick, Katherine M Boydell, Elaine Stasiulis, H Bruce Ferguson, Karen Blase, Dean Fixsen |
| Abstract |
Children with emotional and behavioural disorders should be able to count on receiving care that meets their needs and is based on the best scientific evidence available, however, many do not receive these services. Implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) relies, in part, on the research utilization practices of mental health care providers. This study reports on a survey of research utilization practices among 80 children's mental health (CMH) service provider organizations in Ontario, Canada. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 27% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,272
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,549
of 1,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,289
of 81,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.