You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acquired copy number alterations in adult acute myeloid leukemia genomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0903091106 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J. Walter, Jacqueline E. Payton, Rhonda E. Ries, William D. Shannon, Hrishikesh Deshmukh, Yu Zhao, Jack Baty, Sharon Heath, Peter Westervelt, Mark A. Watson, Michael H. Tomasson, Rakesh Nagarajan, Brian P. O'Gara, Clara D. Bloomfield, Krzysztof Mrózek, Rebecca R. Selzer, Todd A. Richmond, Jacob Kitzman, Joel Geoghegan, Peggy S. Eis, Rachel Maupin, Robert S. Fulton, Michael McLellan, Richard K. Wilson, Elaine R. Mardis, Daniel C. Link, Timothy A. Graubert, John F. DiPersio, Timothy J. Ley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 60 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,278,354
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#43,031
of 102,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,005
of 119,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#267
of 712 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 712 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.