↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of DNA repair defects during malignant progression of low-grade gliomas after temozolomide treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolution of DNA repair defects during malignant progression of low-grade gliomas after temozolomide treatment
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00401-015-1403-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hinke F. van Thuijl, Tali Mazor, Brett E. Johnson, Shaun D. Fouse, Koki Aihara, Chibo Hong, Annika Malmström, Martin Hallbeck, Jan J. Heimans, Jenneke J. Kloezeman, Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Martine L. M. Lamfers, Nobuhito Saito, Hiroyuki Aburatani, Akitake Mukasa, Mitchell S. Berger, Peter Söderkvist, Barry S. Taylor, Annette M. Molinaro, Pieter Wesseling, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Susan M. Chang, Bauke Ylstra, Joseph F. Costello

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 19 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,204,344
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,477
of 2,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,996
of 260,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.