↓ Skip to main content

DNA damage signaling assessed in individual cells in relation to the cell cycle phase and induction of apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA damage signaling assessed in individual cells in relation to the cell cycle phase and induction of apoptosis
Published in
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, November 2012
DOI 10.3109/10408363.2012.738808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz, Hong Zhao, H. Dorota Halicka, Paulina Rybak, Jurek Dobrucki, Donald Wlodkowic

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 2 5%
Japan 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 30%
Researcher 7 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,638,456
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#122
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,710
of 183,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.