Title |
Robot-assisted stereotactic brainstem biopsy in children: prospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Robotic Surgery, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11701-018-0899-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
William Dawes, Hani J. Marcus, Martin Tisdall, Kristian Aquilina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 29% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,021,930
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#474
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,932
of 437,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Robotic Surgery
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.