↓ Skip to main content

A Possible Second Type of Maternal–Fetal Immune Interaction Involved in Both Male and Female Homosexuality

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
A Possible Second Type of Maternal–Fetal Immune Interaction Involved in Both Male and Female Homosexuality
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10508-011-9896-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ray Blanchard

Abstract

Recent research has found that the mothers of firstborn homosexual sons produce fewer subsequent offspring than do the mothers of firstborn heterosexual sons. It was hypothesized that a subset of mothers of firstborn homosexuals may be responsible for this finding. If there is a subset of mothers whose immune reactions cause their first male fetus to be homosexual and their subsequent fetuses to die, then their immune reactions should also cause their first male fetus to have a lower birth weight. This leads to the prediction that, within the population of firstborn homosexual men, those with no younger siblings should also tend to have lower birth weights. This prediction was tested using a previously published sample of 1,445 firstborn subjects: 929 heterosexual females, 47 homosexual females, 409 heterosexual males, and 60 homosexual males. The results showed that firstborn homosexuals with no younger siblings (i.e., only children) did have lower birth weights compared with all the other subjects, but the finding applied to firstborn lesbian women as well as firstborn gay men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,021,829
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,264
of 3,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,476
of 258,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#23
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.