| Title |
Epiblast/Germ Line Hypothesis of Cancer Development Revisited: Lesson from the Presence of Oct-4+ Cells in Adult Tissues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-010-9143-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariusz Z. Ratajczak, Dong-Myung Shin, Rui Liu, Wojtek Marlicz, Maciej Tarnowski, Janina Ratajczak, Magda Kucia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#119
of 1,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,676
of 103,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.