↓ Skip to main content

Mental Health Screening of African American Adolescents and Facilitated Access to Care

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Mental Health Screening of African American Adolescents and Facilitated Access to Care
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10597-011-9413-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathilde M. Husky, Deborah A. Kanter, Leslie McGuire, Mark Olfson

Abstract

This study retrospectively reviews de-identified records from school-based mental health screening in a predominantly African American community. We compare participation rates, screening results, referrals to services and access to care of white and African American adolescents. Among those offered screening, 20.1% of white students (n = 297), and 28.8% of African American students (n = 499) were screened (χ(2) = 32.47, df = 1, P < .001). African American students (45.1%) were significantly more likely than white students (33.0%), (AOR = 1.59; P = .003) to be identified as being at risk. In both racial groups, most youth accessed the school-based services (89.02%, 95% CI 82.25-95.79) and community services (86.57%, 95% CI 78.41-94.73) to which they were referred. The groups did not differ in the odds of accessing community-based services (AOR = .58; P = .49). African American students were, however, more likely than white students to access school-based services (AOR = 10.08; P = .022). The findings support the effectiveness of screening in school settings in predominantly African American communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 17 21%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 17%
Psychology 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,216,332
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#38
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,957
of 109,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.