↓ Skip to main content

MIF promoter polymorphisms are associated with epiretinal membrane but not retinal detachment with PVR in an american population

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Eye Research, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MIF promoter polymorphisms are associated with epiretinal membrane but not retinal detachment with PVR in an american population
Published in
Experimental Eye Research, May 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.exer.2019.05.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen M Cebulla, William Stevenson, Heather Van Law, Tyler Heisler-Taylor, Sumaya Hamadmad, Mohd Hussain Shah, Bongsu Kim, Frederick H Davidorf, Matthew Ohr, Michael Wells, Fatoumata Yanoga, Susie Chang, William Terrell, Daniel M Miller, Dino Klisovic, John B Allen, Niraj Shah, Elena Geraymovych, Ahmad B Tarabishy, Srinivas S Kondapalli, Beatrice Y Brewington, Andrea Inman, Demarcus Williams, Rania Kusibati, Jay Mathias, Yildiz Vedat, Soledad Fernandez, C Ellis Wisely, Robert Pilarski, Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Eye Research
#2,521
of 2,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,326
of 365,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Eye Research
#33
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,935 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.