↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology of Pervasive Developmental Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Research, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
16 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1370 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1434 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology of Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Published in
Pediatric Research, June 2009
DOI 10.1203/pdr.0b013e31819e7203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Fombonne

Abstract

This article reviews the results of 43 studies published since 1966 that provided estimates for the prevalence of pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs), including autistic disorder, Asperger disorder, PDD not otherwise specified, and childhood disintegrative disorder. The prevalence of autistic disorder has increased in recent surveys and current estimates of prevalence are around 20/10,000, whereas the prevalence for PDD not otherwise specified is around 30/10,000 in recent surveys. Prevalence of Asperger disorder is much lower than that for autistic disorder and childhood disintegrative disorder is a very rare disorder with a prevalence of about 2/100,000. Combined all together, recent studies that have examined the whole spectrum of PDDs have consistently provided estimates in the 60-70/10,000 range, making PDD one of the most frequent childhood neurodevelopmental disorders. The meaning of the increase in prevalence in recent decades is reviewed. There is evidence that the broadening of the concept, the expansion of diagnostic criteria, the development of services, and improved awareness of the condition have played a major role in explaining this increase, although it cannot be ruled out that other factors might have also contributed to that trend.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 <1%
United States 9 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1384 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 232 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 226 16%
Student > Bachelor 210 15%
Researcher 126 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 115 8%
Other 241 17%
Unknown 284 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 359 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 227 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 9%
Neuroscience 99 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 5%
Other 227 16%
Unknown 327 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#595,334
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#100
of 5,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,429
of 127,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.