↓ Skip to main content

The use of digital photographs for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: the AGES-Reykjavik study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
The use of digital photographs for the diagnosis of hand osteoarthritis: the AGES-Reykjavik study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helgi Jonsson, Gudrun P Helgadottir, Thor Aspelund, Johanna E Sverrisdottir, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Sigurdur Sigurdsson, Gudmundur J Eliasson, Asbjorn Jonsson, Thorvaldur Ingvarsson, Tamara B Harris, Lenore Launer, Vilmundur Gudnason

Abstract

The objective of the study was to standardize a method using digital photographs to diagnose and grade hand osteoarthritis (HOA), to compare it with radiographs and clinical examination with regard to prevalence and relation to symptoms, and finally to construct a simple shortened version suitable for use in very large studies, where a global estimate may be preferable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 23%
Researcher 8 15%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 40%
Engineering 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2012.
All research outputs
#13,863,864
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,015
of 4,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,733
of 155,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.