↓ Skip to main content

Facilitators, best practices and barriers to integrating family planning data in Uganda’s health management information system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Facilitators, best practices and barriers to integrating family planning data in Uganda’s health management information system
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12913-019-4151-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Ojiambo Wandera, Betty Kwagala, Olivia Nankinga, Patricia Ndugga, Allen Kabagenyi, Bridgit Adamou, Benjamin Kachero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 179 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 21%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Lecturer 7 4%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 79 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 7%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Computer Science 7 4%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 82 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,842,607
of 23,698,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,687
of 7,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,239
of 351,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#29
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,698,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.