↓ Skip to main content

Implications of Healthcare Payment Reform for Clinical Psychologists in Medical Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Implications of Healthcare Payment Reform for Clinical Psychologists in Medical Settings
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10880-016-9451-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel H. Hubley, Benjamin F. Miller

Abstract

Health reform, post the passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, has highlighted the need to better address critical issues such as primary care, behavioral health, and payment reform. Much of this need is subsequent to robust data showing the seemingly uncontrollable growth of healthcare costs, and the exacerbation of these costs for patients with comorbid behavioral health and medical conditions. There is increasing recognition that incorporating behavioral health in primary care leads to improved outcomes and better care. To address these problems, primary care will play critical roles across the healthcare system, especially in the delivery of behavioral health services. Psychologists are uniquely positioned to take advantage of this propitious moment and can help facilitate the integration of behavioral and primary care by developing competencies in integrated care, training a capable workforce, and advocating for integrated care as the status quo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#13,768,217
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#265
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,965
of 297,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.