↓ Skip to main content

Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Prognostic Factors and Oncologic Outcome Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Prognostic Factors and Oncologic Outcome Analysis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2013
DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3358-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepa Magge, Mazen S. Zenati, Frances Austin, Arun Mavanur, Magesh Sathaiah, Lekshmi Ramalingam, Heather Jones, Amer H. Zureikat, Matthew Holtzman, Steven Ahrendt, James Pingpank, Herbert J. Zeh, David L. Bartlett, Haroon A. Choudry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Other 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2020.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3,190
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,238
of 323,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#15
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.