↓ Skip to main content

Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case

Overview of attention for article published in Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human rights v. Insufficient climate action: The Urgenda case
Published in
Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, April 2019
DOI 10.1177/0924051919844375
Authors

Ingrid Leijten

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 8 24%
Social Sciences 5 15%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 41%