You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Messaging matters: A systematic review of the conservation messaging literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.020 |
| Authors |
Lindall R. Kidd, Georgia E. Garrard, Sarah A. Bekessy, Morena Mills, Adrian R. Camilleri, Fiona Fidler, Kelly S. Fielding, Ascelin Gordon, Emily A. Gregg, Alexander M. Kusmanoff, Winnifred Louis, Katie Moon, Jenny A. Robinson, Matthew J. Selinske, Danielle Shanahan, Vanessa M. Adams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 128 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 27 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 13% |
| United States | 13 | 10% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 76 | 59% |
| Scientists | 47 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 321 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 17% |
| Researcher | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 80 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 60 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 13% |
| Psychology | 20 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 50 | 16% |
| Unknown | 92 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#535,278
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#424
of 6,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,020
of 363,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#15
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.