↓ Skip to main content

Thirty-day mortality after hip fractures: has anything changed?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
Thirty-day mortality after hip fractures: has anything changed?
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00590-016-1744-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dionysios Giannoulis, Giorgio M. Calori, Peter V. Giannoudis

Abstract

Bone density insufficiency is the main cause for significant musculoskeletal trauma in the elderly population following low-energy falls. Hip fractures, in particular, represent an important public health concern taking into account the complicated needs of the patients due to their medical comorbidities as well as their rehabilitation and social demands. The annual cost for the care of these patients is estimated at around 2 billion pounds (£) in the UK and is ever growing. An increased early and late mortality rate is also recognised in these injuries together with significant adversities for the patients. Lately, in order to improve the outcomes of this special cohort of patients, fast-track care pathways and government initiatives have been implemented. It appears that these measures have contributed in a steady year-by-year reduction of the 30-day mortality rates. Whether we have currently reached a plateau or whether an ongoing reduction in mortality rates will continue to be observed is yet to be seen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Other 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,140
of 24,049,457 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#134
of 911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,449
of 303,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,049,457 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.