| Title |
Evaluation of Cancer 101: An Educational Program for Native Settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Education, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13187-010-0046-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teresa Garrett Hill, Katherine Josa Briant, Deborah Bowen, Verné Boerner, Thuy Vu, Kerri Lopez, Eric Vinson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 18% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,475,808
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#299
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,386
of 166,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.