↓ Skip to main content

Preferred flavors and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use among never, current, and former smokers

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Preferred flavors and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use among never, current, and former smokers
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00038-015-0764-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla J. Berg

Abstract

To compare e-cigarette flavors preferred and reasons for use and discontinued use across never, current, and former e-cigarette users and cigarette smokers. We recruited 1567 participants aged 18-34 years through Facebook ads targeting tobacco users and nonusers in August 2014 to complete an online survey. We assessed tobacco use, preferred flavors, and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use. Our sample was 49 % male, 87 % White; 56 % current cigarette smokers; and 53 % e-cigarette users. Current e-cigarette users used an average of 20.9 days in the past 30 (SD = 11.7) and 55.2 puffs/day (SD = 37.3). Compared to never and current smokers, former smokers used e-cigarettes more frequently (p's <0.001). Among users and nonusers, the most preferred was fruit flavors, and the most commonly reported reason for e-cigarette use was "they might be less harmful than cigarettes". The most endorsed reason for discontinued e-cigarette use was "using other tobacco products instead". Never, current, and former smokers had distinct reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use and differed in flavor preferences. Regulating marketing and flavors may impact e-cigarette uptake by young adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 13 8%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 41 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 57 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,284,720
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#121
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,156
of 392,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.