↓ Skip to main content

Clinical practice update on heart failure 2019: pharmacotherapy, procedures, devices and patient management. An expert consensus meeting report of the Heart Failure Association of the European…

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Heart Failure, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 2,559)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
302 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
535 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
670 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical practice update on heart failure 2019: pharmacotherapy, procedures, devices and patient management. An expert consensus meeting report of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
Published in
European Journal of Heart Failure, August 2019
DOI 10.1002/ejhf.1531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petar M. Seferovic, Piotr Ponikowski, Stefan D. Anker, Johann Bauersachs, Ovidiu Chioncel, John G.F. Cleland, Rudolf A. de Boer, Heinz Drexel, Tuvia Ben Gal, Loreena Hill, Tiny Jaarsma, Ewa A. Jankowska, Markus S. Anker, Mitja Lainscak, Basil S. Lewis, Theresa McDonagh, Marco Metra, Davor Milicic, Wilfried Mullens, Massimo F. Piepoli, Giuseppe Rosano, Frank Ruschitzka, Maurizio Volterrani, Adriaan A. Voors, Gerasimos Filippatos, Andrew J.S. Coats

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 302 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 670 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 670 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 10%
Other 61 9%
Student > Postgraduate 54 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 8%
Student > Bachelor 45 7%
Other 155 23%
Unknown 238 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 278 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 2%
Social Sciences 10 1%
Other 58 9%
Unknown 260 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#123,420
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#20
of 2,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,307
of 352,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.