↓ Skip to main content

Judgments of Sexual Attractiveness: A Study of the Yali Tribe in Papua

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Judgments of Sexual Attractiveness: A Study of the Yali Tribe in Papua
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10508-012-9906-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piotr Sorokowski, Agnieszka Sorokowska

Abstract

Preferences for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS), and leg-to-body ratio (LBR) have been investigated predominantly in Western cultures. The aim of the present study was to examine the preferences of a relatively isolated, indigenous population (i.e., Yali of Papua, inhabiting the mountainous terrain east of the Baliem valley). A total of 53 women and 52 men participated in the study. Study sites differed in distance from Wamena, the biggest settlement in the region, and frequency of tourists' visits. We found that the mate preferences among Yali men and women for WHR, LBR, and SDS were not exactly the same as in Western samples. Yali preferred low women's WHR and relatively high women's (but not men's) LBR. Women's and men's ratings of each SDS set were similar, which suggests that the "male-taller norm" in Yali tribe was far weaker than in Western cultures. Additionally, the observed preferences were modified by contact with different cultures, age, and accessibility of food resources (pig possession). Our results suggest that human norms of attractiveness are malleable and can change with exposure to different environments and conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Lecturer 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 36%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Philosophy 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,303,850
of 24,699,496 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#664
of 3,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,094
of 260,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,699,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.